That’s a fantastic problem, Ted. I’m undecided. Here is a few examples of what I’ve heard in different areas over the Federal 210 vs Federal 210M discrepancies:

one   Reply This really is an more mature thread, you might not receive a response, and will be reviving an old thread. Be sure to think about making a new thread.

I could see the real difference from the indent remaining via the FP. The hooked up pic demonstrates remaining spherical as one which did not ignite.

Another thing which i do keep on with is: when loading for my M1A and AR I take advantage of 'armed service' primers. Particularly in the M1A. My understanding may be the 'civilian' primers are too delicate and boost the infamous 'slam -fires'

I'll give the Federals a test as I do not load close to max in any case. I like to maintain my loads in the middle. Given that I can shoot good teams and place holes while in the paper I am satisfied, moreover I do think it's significantly less demanding on your own firearm and even more enjoyable to shoot.

And eventually, all the rest of my manuals You should not specifiy a circumstance or primer manufacturer. I come about to have Starline brass and WSPM primers, so, I suppose I get started the laods for my 357 magnum a little bit reduce if there is a variance from what I have and what the manual specifies. I'll however, try out the h2o volume test for my individual understanding. Thanks!

I guess if I had to select a model ... It could be Winchester. They feed just wonderful in my Dillon RL550 whereas CCIs Will not. The skirts on CCI primers are just tough enough wherever they don't favor automated primer feeders and jam. When I load on my solitary stage RCBS Rockchucker, it does not make much variance.

An actual good diagram of the primer which includes its factors is integrated and a brief description of primer compounds can also be incorporated,

This can be an more mature thread, you might not get a response, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Remember to consider developing a new thread.

Quick remedy: your complete "no cost environment" has It really is trousers down down below It can be knees, and also the lesson continues to be unpleasant.

These conditions Do not surface to contain the primers crimped in, since they had been hardly ever seriously military brass. But I did ream them out and experienced A simpler time seating new primers.

Nevertheless, in many cases, using a magnum primer when federal primers gm215m standard primers are stated may be alright, so long as the hundreds aren't any wherever around highest.

The main issue of my first put up is: wherever would be the tough numbers on this issue? Lots of "facts" on the market to the 'Web, and a great deal of that type of stuff has become repeated listed here, however it is all phrases, not difficult figures/figures. The "war in Ukraine" is stated numerous periods, but how much of our domestic primers output is definitely ending up in Ukraine?

.. the firing pin Power could possibly be below the threshold for optimistic detonation. Light-weight primer strikes with "duds" are noticeable but a primer that creates anything a lot less than whole electricity is simply clear after you chronograph loads or shoot teams. I did plenty of testing a few years ago and burned up a pair thousand handgun primers in the midst of my assessments. Here is a website link with some of my results ... Post # 3 and #seven,